Monday, February 16, 2015

Workplace Motivation

The driven force that is responsible for why an individual may perform certain activities is known as motivation which is “generally defined as the processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal” (Ran, 2009).  Individual’s get up and go to work every day for many reasons, however financial gain is the main reason for most people, which is extrinsic motivation.  Money is a form of extrinsic motivation for many people to hold certain jobs; however when it comes to the workplace, motivation is extremely important because many organizations rely on high levels of productivity from their employees to increase revenue.  This paper will examine how various motivational strategies affect productivity in the HVAC sales industry by explaining organizational efforts to improve performance, employees’ resistance to increasing productivity and the management’s philosophy of motivation and its practices.  In addition to that this paper will analyze the implications of applying any two motivational theories not currently in practice at this place of business and identify how these theories would affect management and employees.
Workplace motivational theories
While working in the HVAC sales industry I worked with many different people with different personality types that would suggest a need for different types of motivational strategies.  The company that I worked for had a relatively small staff that included inside salespeople, outside salespeople, warehouse workers, and office personnel. With different expectations being set for each department, it would be beneficial for management to apply different motivational strategies to increase not only productivity by the level of morale within the company.
Inside salespeople have the most important job at the company in my opinion because they generate the revenue because they are responsible for handling all transactions that involve the customers in person and over the phone, which can be very stressful if other problems arise in other departments such as the warehouse which is responsible for shipping and receiving merchandise.  There are no motivational strategies currently in place for employees; however I believe that the goal setting theory would be applicable for inside and outside sales personnel.  In order for the company to be successful and maintain their staff they have to bring in a certain amount of revenue and if the goal setting theory of motivation was in place, which is a “theory of motivation that states that specific and challenging goals are claimed to lead to higher performance” ("Goal-setting theory," 2003), management would give sales personnel “a clear sense of purpose and direction that provide something for which to strive and ultimately attain” ("Goal-setting theory," 2003).
The warehouse employees are responsible for shipping and receiving merchandise as well as making sure items are put in the correct location within the warehouse.  If an error occurs within the warehouse it will have an adverse effect on sales.  I can see the goal setting theory being applicable for warehouse personnel, however I think the achievement motivation is more suitable because it is “the need for success or attainment of excellence” (Sisk, 2009) in which making sure that customers receive the correct orders in a timely fashion increases productivity.
Office personnel responsibilities include maintaining customers’ accounts to ensure that addresses, telephone numbers and contact information is accurate and up to date as well as bills are being paid.  In addition to maintaining customer accounts they are also responsible for making sure that the merchandise that we receive is paid for.  The responsibilities of the office personnel can be very stressful at times especially if it can cause a problem within the sales department which is why I believe that the stress and coping motivational theory is applicable. How office personnel handle certain situations that involve customers is known as coping which “refers to the thoughts and behaviors that people use to deal with stressful situations” (Tennen, 2007).
Organizational efforts to improve performance
The success of the company relies completely on employee productivity, specifically in sales and if there are problems in the warehouse or with office personnel with customers’ orders or accounts it will have an adverse effect on sales, therefore it is very important for management to implement plans and strategies to improve performance which can be done in several steps.  The first step is effective communication in which management communicate their expectations and stress the importance of personal accountability to their employees.  Employees should never have to assume what is expected of them it should be communicated to them so there are no misunderstandings.  Employee evaluations is another way to improve performance because it allows management to communicate with employees their strengths and weaknesses within their job performance.  In addition to employee evaluations, employee recognition, such as employee of the month or similar acknowledgments, promotions and bonuses is also a way to improve performance because many people thrive off of being noticed for their hard work.
Employees’ resistance to increase productivity
It is very important to develop organizational efforts to improve performance because when employees performance improve it can result in productivity increasing; however if there are changes that have to occur within the organization many employees may show some resistance because they may not fully understand the advantages of the changes being made, how the changes will affect them and they may also be concerned about achieving the responsibilities set forth due to the changes that are occurring.  The goal-setting theory is the best way to offset employee resistance to increase productivity because employers need to effectively communicate with employees the goals of the company and what is expected from everyone. 
Management’s philosophy of motivation and is practices
Management philosophy is the basis for a positive work environment and effects manager’s methods to motivation.  The interaction between managers and employees affects their behavior which ultimately affects productivity.  When managers promote positivity within the workplace, employees are more than likely to be more productive.  While working in HVAC sales the environment was very hostile and the manager was very negative; however the salaries were very commensurable compared to other companies and it was not contingent on whether or not sales were made, therefore employees were not motivated to increase productivity because there were no incentives to do so. 
Implications of applying motivational theories
Motivational theories at the workplace provide explanations on what motivates individuals to perform certain ways and when applied in specific settings it helps employers understand the commitment level of their employees to the goals of the company which in turn can guide them to developing and implementing motivational strategies to increase productivity.  If motivational theories are not in place at the start of business there could be some implications once employees become accustomed to operations being ran a certain way.  Applying the goal-setting theory in an organization in which goals were never clear could cause high levels of stress on employees because they may feel like they may not be able to satisfy the expectations of the goal.  The implications of applying the achievement motivation theory could be the result of a hostile work environment due to the manager not promoting positivity through communication with employees, therefore making the desire to attain excellence difficult.
How Theories affect management and employees
The goal-setting theory affects management and employees in several different ways.  When management applies the goal-setting theory they are communicating the goals of the company with employees which rely on high levels of productivity.  If there is not a good working relationship between management and the employees, effectively communicating the goals could be a challenge for management and if the goals are not clear the employees may not have a full understanding of the expectations. 
Conclusion
Motivational theories applied at the workplace can have a direct effect on the level of productivity within an organization.  Working in HVAC sales allowed me the opportunity to understand the importance of applying motivational theories at the workplace because they provide assistance with developing organizational efforts to improve performance; however it is a possibility that employees may show some resistance to increase productivity when the communication is not clear between management and employees.  Managers that have a positive viewpoint on motivation and practice effective communication within the organization have a better chance at increasing productivity and boosting the morale of the environment. There are a several implications in applying the goal-setting theory and the achievement motivation theory within an organization that have no motivational theories in position, such as in HVAC sales, which can have an adverse effect on management and employees if effective communication is not present. 


Monday, February 9, 2015

Motivation Concepts Analysis

                               Motivation Concepts Analysis
Motivation is the force that is mostly responsible for human behavior; it is “the intention of achieving a goal, leading to goal-directed behavior” ("Motivation," 2013).  The need to survive in this world prompts motivation in the workforce because individuals have needs that only can be met financially.  Many theories on motivation have been developed in the field of psychology to provide explanations on different levels of motivation.  This paper will examine one theory and describe how this theory would and would not be applicable if applied to two or more workplace situations based on my own personal experience.  This paper will also assess the need to develop and create new theoretical models of motivation in today’s changing work environment in the instance when the theory was not applicable to your experience.  This paper will also explain the ramifications of failing to meet or create new theoretical models of motivation and describe how theoretical models of motivation can affect personal satisfaction and productivity.  
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
The study of motivation can be contributed to many philosophers in the early times that include three grand theories known as will, instinct and drive which have led to a better understanding of human motivation; however I have elected to examine Cognitive Dissonance theory which is a mini theory that will explain some of motivated behavior.   I chose Cognitive Dissonance theory because I personally believe that cognitive dissonance affects the manner in which an individual passes judgment and makes important decisions that concern morals and beliefs which ultimately takes place in the workforce. 
The Cognitive Dissonance was developed by Leon Festinger in 1957 based on his beliefs that “if an uncomfortable feeling or stress is cause by simultaneously holing two contradictory ideas (cognitions), then people will strive to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) by modifying an existing belief or by rejecting one of the two conflicting ideas” (Grigg, 2008).
Cognitive Dissonance and workplace experiences
I worked in hvac sales for well over 10 years and it was a very hostile unorganized work environment in which I experienced cognitive dissonance regularly that ultimately increased my stress level which affected my job performance on so many occasions.  As a sales representative I personally felt that professionalism was very important especially when it came to customer service; however I was the youngest and only female in sales which made it very hard to uphold my beliefs on professionalism and courtesy when I was constantly being yelled at and disrespected by fellow workers who didn’t believe that I knew enough to handle the job because I was a female and customers that would rather have a male sales representative.  There were customers that would frequent the store that no one wanted to help so most of the guys would act like they were busy and didn’t see the customer in the store or they would take their break upon arrival of that customer.  The store manager was well aware of what was being done but never addressed the issue with those that avoided certain customers which kind of made it seem like that form of behavior was acceptable and I found myself doing the same thing but I felt that it was wrong which is why I believe the cognitive dissonance theory is applicable to this situation. The feelings that I encountered while avoiding certain customers that were considered problems motivated me to change my behavior and stick to my morals and beliefs with being professional and courteous to all customers which in turn increased my productivity because it made customers want me to help them every time they visited the store.
Currently I am a school bus driver and I personally believe that cognitive dissonance theory is applicable to many situations in this position because as a school bus driver I am held to very high expectations.  Providing transportation for school-aged children is a very important task in which safety should always be considered first and because I am a parent whose children also ride the school bus I can really appreciate the importance in all of the rules and regulations that are put in place to ensure the safety of the children.  Many of the school bus drivers do not obey the speed limit which has contributed to accidents.  I am not one of those drivers because I am not in a rush to get anywhere especially when the road conditions are not so good; however there have been instances when other drivers showed aggression towards me on the road because I was not driving above the speed limit.  I believe that cognitive dissonance theory is applicable to this situation because of the uncomfortable feelings I was feeling it motivated to yield to those drivers and allow them to pass me and continue to drive at the speed limit focusing on the safety of my students first.
As a sales representative everyone was salary and there was no commission; however we did receive year-end bonuses based on the sales report that came out at the end of the year.  The salaries were pretty good so there was no incentive for anyone to want to put forth more effort to increase sales because whether equipment was sold or not everyone still received their salary.  The cognitive theory is not applicable to this situation because morals are not really in question, therefore this experience can be used to develop and create new theoretical models of motivation in today’s changing work environment.
The need to develop and create new theoretical models
Human behavior and motivation is always changing that is what makes the field of psychology very important because it provides explanations of the changes as the times change.  Changes in the economy plays a major role in motivation in the workplace which is why there is a need to develop and create new theoretical models to reflect those changes.  In the instance in which the cognitive dissonance theory is not applicable when it involves motivating employees to increase their sales without receiving any additional incentives outside of their salary another theoretical model would have to be developed to gain understanding on what could motivate these employees.
Ramifications of creating new theoretical models of motivation
Creating new theoretical models of motivation can be very challenging especially when it comes to the workplace because motivation is based on individual needs and not everyone share the same needs outside of the basics.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation varies depending on the individual, for example an increase in salary can motivate some employees to increase productivity while satisfied customers can motivate other employees to increase productivity because of the internal feelings received from seeing a customer satisfied.
Personal satisfaction and productivity
Theoretical models of motivation can affect personal satisfaction and productivity because they provide a better understanding on “individual actions and what determines them” (Graves, 2007).  When an employer understands motivation and behavior they can provide their employees with things that could give them personal satisfaction and with that productivity can increase. 
Conclusion
Motivation affects human behavior in many ways and many theories have been developed dating back to ancient greek times to provide an explanation on those factors.  I chose the cognitive dissonance theory to explain motivation based on morals, values, and beliefs in certain situations at the workplace because I have always been the type of person that wants to do what is right to avoid those uncomfortable feelings that I learned is known as cognitive dissonance.  Applying the cognitive dissonance theory suggests that those uncomfortable feelings will motivate an individual to change their behavior so those feelings can go away which is something that I have experienced in many situations at the workplace.