Showing posts with label PSY 450. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PSY 450. Show all posts

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Ethnic Group Conflict

The world is composed of countries that are all maintained by different forms of governments that are led by individuals from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds.  Many cultures share similar beliefs and values; however there are many differences that create conflict between cultures and ethnic groups. In this paper I am going to examine the similarities and differences between Al-Qaeda and America.  As a part of the examination I will discuss the concept of conformity and how it relates to Al-Qaeda and America.  I also will explain the relationship between social perception and social cognition and how these concepts apply to Al-Qaeda and America and I will discuss the social perceptions that will need to be addressed in order to resolve the conflict between Al-Qaeda and America.
Ethnic conflict is defined as “one of the major threats to international peace and security” (Reuter, 2011p. 141) because it is an attempt by one ethnic group to oppress or limit the freedom of another ethnic group because of cultural views, economics or aspects of religion.  Ethnic conflict has declined over the years, however it still “remains one of the main sources of warfare and instability on major regions of the world” (Reuter, 2011 p.141). The differences amongst ethnic groups can create conflict when those differences “are used to promote prejudice and discrimination against a group that has been marked or stigmatized” ("Ethnic Conflict," 2008 p.1). There are two opposing standpoints that give a standard explanation of how ethnic group conflict can occur within a country or between countries, cultural and structural.  The “cultural paradigm regards ethnic conflict as a social identity issue prompted by real or perceived threat to group boundaries and a familiar way of life” ("Ethnic Conflict," 2008 p.1).  The “structural paradigm postulates that ethnic conflict is not about ethnicity at all but rather involves economic and political factors, including territory.  Ethnicity may be manipulated to gain economic and political power, and for stratifying societies or nation-states within the world system” ("Ethnic Conflict," 2008 p.1).
The United States of America along with other countries have been under attack in recent years by the forces of a group known as Al-Qaeda which “is an international terrorist network founded by Usama bin Laden (the “Osama” spelling is deprecated, because there is no letter “O” in Arabic)” (Global Security, 2014).  Usama bin Laden formed Al-Qaeda around 1988 to help “finance, recruit, transport and train thousands of fighters from dozens of countries to be part of an Afghan resistance to defeat the Soviet Union.  To continue the holy war beyond Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda’s current goal is to establish a pan-Islamic Caliphate throughout the world by working with allied Islamic extremist groups to overthrow regimes it deemed non-Islamic and expelling Westerners and non-Muslims from Muslim countries” (Global Security, 2014). 
According to the encyclopedia of global religion “Islam is the name for the faith and the community of Muslims around the world who are adherents of the teachings of the Qur’an as revealed to Prophet Muhammad” (Kamali, 2012 p.577).  Islam is said to be the “second largest religion in the world after Christianity” (Kamali, 2012 p.577).  Muslims are taught that there is “only One God, Judgment and individual accountability for actions” ("Understanding Islamic beliefs," 2003).  Peace is supposed to be very important to the Islamic faith as the Quran, which is the “holy book of Islam”, “instructs Muslins to respect other faiths” ("Understanding Islamic beliefs," 2003). The teachings of the Islamic faith are about “the worship of God, respect and care for parents, good neighboring and giving to the needy, poor and orphaned.  Any act of goodness will elevate a person closer to God” ("Understanding Islamic beliefs," 2003).  Al-Qaeda is a terrorist group that goes against every principle of the Islamic faith, however the members of Al-Qaeda do everything in the name of Islam which is considered to be “wrongly using the name of Islam for political or financial gain” ("Understanding Islamic beliefs," 2003). 
Conformity is “a form of social influence in which individuals changes their attitudes and/or behavior to adhere to a group or social norm” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p. 283).   Social psychology explains conformity in terms of how an individual may conform not only to “escape sanctions, but to live up to the expectations of others and therefore remain in their good graces.  This is especially true when the “others” represent a majority” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.283).  For example, in America we have leaders and governments officials that represent the majority and we are supposed to listen to and the follow the rules that they have established whether or not we agree or not because of their positions of authority and their representation of America.  In America individuals are expected to conform to whatever they are told by authority figures, media, and societal norms.  Individuals conformed to Al-Qaeda because of their strong belief in the Islamic faith and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad although the Islamic faith does not believe in terrorism; Al-Qaeda used Islam to recruit members and those members conformed to the acts and teachings of the Al-Qaeda, which was to eliminate all non-Muslims because they believed that they were doing so in the name of Prophet Muhammad.
Social perception is “the process through which we seek to know and understand other people and ourselves”, whereas social cognition is “the process through which we interpret, remember, and then use information about the social world” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.276). The ongoing conflict between Al-Qaeda and America has the United States government recalling the previous attacks that Al-Qaeda launched against America in an effort to try and prevent future attacks.  Special intelligence agencies were created to study Al-Qaeda in order to gain some sort of understanding as to why they “issued a declaration calling on Muslims to kill American-including civilians-as well as those who are allied with them from among the helpers of Satan” (Global Security, 2014). The information that was gathered and continues to be gathered is used to assist the American government in protecting its citizens from “tactics including assassinations, bombings, hijacking, kidnapping, suicide attacks, and  the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons” (Global Security, 2014).
In relation to the conflict between Al-Qaeda and America social perception can be referred to “the broad tendency pf perceivers to note and interpret the appearance, behavior, and intentions of others.  Such perception is informed by multiple cues that originate in body features and behaviors, and it affects the perceiver’s attitudes about behaviors directed toward others” (Johnson, 2010 p. 895).  During the first gulf war American soldiers were positioned in Saudi Arabia, which is “the land of the two mosques (Mecca and Medina) and is profaned sacred soil (Pocock, 2014)”to Muslims.   Due to American soldiers being in Saudi Arabia, they were perceived as intruders to Muslims and that is said to be the reason for the forming of Al-Qaeda.  One would think that if American troops were withdrawn from Saudi Arabia, that will eliminate the perception that Al-Qaeda has that Americans are intruders and need to be destroyed, however because of the Islamic extremist views of Al-Qaeda I believe that it is impossible to address any social perceptions in an effort to resolve the conflict between Al-Qaeda and America.  Al-Qaeda believes that they are fulfilling the wishes of God by eliminating all non-Muslims and because America has sent troops on to their lands to combat they believe that Americans oppose God, therefore increasing the intensity of the conflict.  It is impossible for America to negotiate with Al-Qaeda because of their beliefs that they are fulfilling the wishes of God, so that is why America had to implement a plan to eliminate all members of Al-Qaeda.
The social perception between Al-Qaeda and America also carries consequences because of the war on terrorism that was launched by the United States Government to protect its citizens.  The war on terrorism created a perception that all individuals of the Islamic faith could possibly have the same views as Al-Qaeda creating tension between non-Muslims and Muslims here in America because of all the attacks that were launched against America it created a fear for non-Muslims.  The term “social category knowledge caries interpersonal consequences because it evokes related knowledge structures, or stereotypes” (Johnson, 2010).  Those stereotypes prompted Muslims here in America to become targets of scrutiny from non-Muslims because of the perception that all Muslims are a part of the terrorist group known as Al-Qaeda. 
In conclusion, I chose to examine the conflict between Al-Qaeda and America because of the impact this conflict has had on the citizens here in the United States of America I wanted to see if it was possible to gain a better understanding as to why Al-Qaeda launched an attack against America and if there is a solution based on the applications of cross-cultural psychology.  My findings have suggested that there is no amicable solution to the conflict between Al-Qaeda and America because in order for the attacks against America to end Al-Qaeda has to be eliminated.  The conflict between Al-Qaeda and America has created a social perception with opposing views from both groups which has made it difficult for Muslims and non-Muslims living here in America as well as in other countries.

Panic Disorder

A psychological disorder can be defined as “a mental health condition that disrupts the normal feelings, mood, or ability of one person to interact with others” ("Psychological Disorders," 2007).  There are several factors that contribute to psychological disorders such as “biological, cognitive, psychodynamic and humanistic and existential components” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p.115). The DSM-IV-TR classifies psychological disorders in different categories and of all those categories I would like to focus on the anxiety disorder category, more particularly panic disorder.  In this paper I will discuss the Epidemiology of panic disorder, socio-cultural and environment factors associated with panic disorder, the relationship between human development and socialization as it relates to panic disorder, treatment of panic disorder and how understanding an individual’s culture is important to the diagnosis and treatment as well as treatment options.
Feelings of sadness and fear can very well be a normal part of life because of certain experiences that individual’s may have that create these feelings.  Anxiety is also a feeling that an individual can have when they sense that it’s a possibility that something bad is going to occur and that feeling can be justified depending on the circumstances, however anxiety is said to be “a feeling of dread, fear, or apprehension, often with no clear justification” (anxiety, 2014).  While it is normal for individual’s to experience anxiety in certain circumstances, if the anxiety continues and they are not able to control those feelings it could be very well possible that an anxiety disorder is present. 
Panic Disorder is a psychological disorder identified in the DSM-IV-TR as one of the main anxiety disorders.  Panic disorder is defined as “an acute anxiety attack often accompanied by agoraphobia or fear of being separated from a safe place” ("Psychological Disorder," 2001 p. 518).  When someone is suffering from panic disorder they often experience panic attacks “in which they feel overwhelmed by anxiety and have a strong urge to escape or get help” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p. 120).   A study conducted on the lifetime occurrences of panic disorder and recurring panic attacks revealed that “females are almost twice as likely as males to suffer panic disorder, and about seven times as likely to suffer repeated panic attacks.  Overall, panic disorders or panic attacks occur in up to one in ten of the general population” ("Panic disorder: History and epidemiology," 1998).  The occurrence of panic disorder is specific and different for every individual and there are “demographic factors such as an individual’s age, gender, and social class are among the variables that can significantly influence” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p. 129) how panic disorder is displayed.
Gender differences in the rates of anxiety disorders, such as panic disorder are explained through socio-cultural factors because “women have noted that traditional female gender roles have not typically emphasized assertion and self-sufficiency” which are “skills that are important for overcoming anxiety” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p. 135).   Environmental factors that may contribute to panic disorder could come from parents who suffer from panic disorder and their children witness the panic attacks, overbearing parenting styles, abusive childhood, and traumatic experiences during childhood, stressful home environment and stressful events in life.
Human development ‘is viewed as the changes in physical, psychological, and social behavior that are experienced by individuals across the life span-from conception to death.  Socialization is the process by which an individual becomes a member of a particular culture and takes on its values and behaviors” (Shiraev, 2010 p. 196).  Human development is how an individual continuously change and evolve as they age, in which their attitudes, beliefs and values may change as they develop new ones.  The process of human development and socialization can be very difficult for someone suffering from panic disorder because of their fear of change panic attacks are more likely to occur followed by shortness of breath, the feeling of being suffocated, light-headedness, weakness, trembling, and pain in the abdomen along with more symptoms making it impossible for an individual to be in a social situation.
There are cultural and historical relativism on how anxiety disorders are defined and classified because the symptoms are similar across cultures, however “different cultures, experience, define, and classify anxiety problems differently” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p.133). Some examples of how different cultures classify anxiety are nervios, which is “ a term used by Latino populations in Latin America and in the United States to describe a range of symptoms of nervous distress; Ataque de nervios is a term used in some Latino cultures to describe an episode of intense anxiety; Shenjing shuairuo is an anxiety syndrome recognized in China including symptoms of physical or mental exhaustion, difficulty sleeping, and concentrating, physical pains, dizziness, headaches and memory loss” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p. 133). Latino and Asian cultures often reveal only the physical aspects when describing their anxiety because signs of emotional stress are denounced in some cultures and individuals are deterred from expressing those types of feelings to anyone outside of their immediate family making diagnosis of panic disorder difficult.  That is why it is very important to understand cultural differences when diagnosing and treating individuals suffering from psychological disorders such as panic disorder. 
Cognitive behavior is known as the most effective form of treatment for individuals suffering from panic disorder.  Cognitive-behavioral therapy “is an action-oriented form of psychosocial therapy that assumes that maladaptive, or faulty, thinking patterns cause maladaptive behavior and negative emotions. (Maladaptive behavior is behavior that is counter-productive or interferes with everyday living.)  The treatment focuses on changing an individual’s thoughts (cognitive patterns) in order to change his or her behavior and emotional state” (Ford-Martin & Lerner, 2011). Systematic desensitization is another form of treatment for individuals suffering from panic disorder that is “intervention involving gradually increasing exposure to a conditioned stimulus (such as a feared object) while practicing relaxation techniques” (Hansell & Damour, 2008 p. 144).  Medications such as antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants and benzodiazepines are used to provide temporary relief of symptoms that individual’s experience with panic disorder; however these medications do not treat the disorder. The use of medications is more likely to be effective when combined with therapy, changes in lifestyle that focuses on the primary cause of panic disorder.
Understanding cultural differences is a very important component in diagnosing and treating panic disorder because many cultures classify their disorders differently based on the morals and beliefs that they are accustomed to.  Cross-cultural psychology “examines psychological diversity and the underlying reasons for such diversity” (Shiraev, 2010 p. 2) which allows for individuals with different cultural backgrounds suffering from panic disorder to receive the proper diagnosis and treatment. 

In conclusion, panic disorder is a psychological disorder that has been said to be more common in women because they lack certain skills that are used to overcome anxiety, however in relation to culture panic disorder is classified in different ways in different cultures making treatment a bit more complex because in some cultures they avoid exposing certain symptoms because of the beliefs and values of their culture in regards to expressing certain feelings outside of the immediate family.  The differences in cultural beliefs, values and morals is a key component that must be understood to properly diagnose and treat and individual suffering from panic disorder.

Intelligence Testiing Article Analysis

There is really no concrete definition of intelligence however “most definitions of intelligence include phrases such as knowing and understanding the reality around us.  Intelligence is also defined as a set of mental skills that helps individuals reach a goal.  Intelligence is also seen as the ability to use knowledge and skills to overcome obstacles.  And finally, intelligence is defined as helping one to adapt to a changing environment” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.147).  The concept of intelligence is a very popular subject in the field of psychology because of the relation it has with an individual’s cognitive abilities.  Cognitive abilities can be defined as “skills which are controlled by the brain which allow us to carry out many different tasks from simple to highly complex” (Marsh, 2011).  Cognitive abilities are more about how an individual learn, remember things and solve problems rather than knowledge that they acquire.
There is a variation in the way intelligence is defined just as the way it is measured.  During the early 1900’s Alfred Binet was asked to develop a test to measure the educational level of students because the “French government had just enacted laws requiring that all children be given a public education” ("Alfred Binet," 2005).  The French government passed these laws to ensure all children were receiving an education; however there was issues on how would the school system identify children that were mentally challenged or suffered from developmental disabilities so they could be provided with special programs to meet their educational needs and that is how the intelligence testing process developed.
Intelligence testing is defined as “a method of assessing a person’s intellectual abilities” (Plucker & Schmalensee, 2009).  Much attention has been dedicated to the psychometric approach to intelligence in the field of psychology because “this view is based on an assumption that our intelligence can receive a numerical value” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p. 122), however giving an explanation on intelligence according to the intelligence testing may be misleading because questions that are used on the intelligence could quite possibly have different meanings in different cultures, therefore resulting in different answers and that is one of the reasons that theories were developed to analyze intelligence testing from cultural perspectives. Standard intelligence test “may not provide for the direct assessment of cognitive skills shaped by a particular cultural environment.  Unless intelligence tests accommodate the activities that people perform in their day-to-day life, the test created in one culture will continue to be biased against other cultural groups” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p. 122).     
Chapter XI, Testing: Intelligence, Aptitude, Personality and Achievement discusses the new L-M Stanford- Binet scales that are used to measure the scores in intelligence testing.  This article evaluates and compares the measures of the old testing scale and the new testing scale and concluded that “the new scale was more effective in diagnosing the dull and defective, more reliable for showing the relative influences of a general versus other factors, but that the order of difficulty of subtests did not agree with that for English children” (Ruch & Orata, 1939).  This article also evaluated the constancy of the intelligence quotient and concluded from a series of studies on children tested one to five years after being placed in foster homes that “the mean level of intelligence of these children is higher than would be expected from the educational, socio-economic, and occupational level represented by their true parents” (Ruch & Orata, 1939). During this study there was no connection found between the true mother’s IQ and the child’s IQ.
  The G-factor also known as general intelligence is a theory that was developed by Charles Spearman “after using a technique known as factor analysis to examine a number of mental aptitude tests, Spearman concluded that scores on these tests were remarkably similar” (Cherry, 2014).  Spearman concluded that from his studies that “intelligence is general cognitive ability that could be measured and numerically expressed” (Cherry, 2014).  The G-factor theory corresponds with the findings discussed in Chapter XI, Testing: Intelligence, Aptitude, Personality and Achievement because the studies focused on the reliability of intelligence measured in children that were separated from the birth mothers to see if there was any relation between the IQ of a mother and the IQ of their child and no relation was found just as the G-factor theory states that intelligence is all about the individual’s cognitive abilities and not their environment.  In relation to culture there is “another approach to the interpretation of test scores on general intelligence, the problem is in the way people across cultures value and construe intelligence” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p. 134).    
According to an article on the rising scores of intelligence tests it is believed that “average scores on intelligence tests are rising substantially and consistently, all over the world” (Neisser, 2014).  Intelligence testing has evolved over the years because of all the theories that seek to measure the intelligence if an individual.  Intelligence tests have also changed because of differences in individuals, particularly culture.  The cause of the rise in intelligence tests scores have yet to be determined , however some have speculated on contributing factors such as “better nutrition, more schooling, altered child-rearing practices and the technology-driven changes of culture itself” (Neisser, 2014).   
The assumption of what factors have contributed to the rise in intelligence tests scores corresponds with the multiple intelligence theory.  Howard Gardner developed the multiple intelligence theory that put emphasis on an individual’s abilities “instead of focusing on the analysis of test scores” (Cherry, 2014).  The theory of multiple intelligence describes eight different intelligences “that are based on skills and abilities that are valued within different cultures” (Cherry, 2014).  The contributing factors to the rising scores on intelligence tests corresponds with the multiple intelligence theory because this theory states that individuals have intelligence in different areas and some of those areas could very well help with the rise in their scores.
In conclusion, Intelligence is difficult to define because of the difference in how individuals perceive knowledge based on their environment, however intelligence tests have been developed to measure human intellect based on cultural standards but there has been discrepancies in those test because they were developed based on a certain culture and not all cultures. Therefore when measuring human intelligence one must consider many contributing factors that surround that individual when evaluating their scores.

Introduction to Cross-cultural Psychology

Psychology is “the scientific investigation of mental processes (thinking, remembering, feeling, etc.) and behavior. Understanding a person requires attention to the individual’s biology, psychological experience, and cultural context” (Kowalski & Westen, 2011 p.3).  Research is conducted to gain understanding on the factors that contribute to why individuals behave in the manner as they do.  The research method in the field of psychology has five simple goals which are to observe and describe behavior, explain the observation, explain the likelihood of future behaviors based on behavior that occurred in the past, attempt to control the behavior from the research findings and help an individual improve their quality of life.  Improving the quality of life is the primary goal of psychology and that is why gaining understanding of individual differences and similarities is extremely important.  In this paper I will analyze cross-cultural psychology by defining cross-cultural psychology and cultural psychology, examine the relationship between cultural psychology and cross-cultural psychology, and examine the role of critical thinking in cross-cultural psychology and the methodology associated with the cross-cultural research.
Culture is made up of “implicit and explicit patterns of behavior acquired and transmitted by symbols and their embodiments in artifacts” (Celebi & Resales, 2008 p.1098). The most important principal of culture involves “traditional (i.e., historically derived and selected) ideas and their attached values” (Celebi & Resales, 2008 p.1098). An individual’s biological make-up can influence their behavior as well as their experiences; however culture is the main factor in influencing behavior through adapted “set of attitudes, behaviors, and symbols shared by a large group of people” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.3)  that are passed down through generations.
Cultural psychology is “the study of how one’s culture affects one’s mind: how one thinks and reasons, what one feels, perceives, and attends to, and how one interprets the world” ("Cultural Psychology," 2007 p.364). The main focus of cultural psychology is to “discover meaningful links between culture and psychology of individuals living in this culture” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p. 24).   Culture is an individual’s environment and people learn from the environment they are exposed to which is what influences their behavior.  Many cultures have traditions that are practiced that involve performing certain rituals that influence behavior for individuals involved that is what makes cultural psychology important because it focuses on how those traditions affect the human mind and motivate behavior.
Cross-cultural psychology is a branch of psychology that studies “the similarities and differences in individual psychological functioning in various cultural and ethnic groups, as well as the relationships between psychological variables and sociocultural, ecological, and biological variables” (Chao, 2008 p.1081). Cross-cultural psychology goal is to examine common behaviors and not so common behaviors to learn ways in which culture influence those behaviors. Cross-cultural psychology is a comparative field, and “draws its conclusion from at least two samples that represent cultural groups” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.2).  The research method involved in cross-cultural psychology is based solely on comparing cultures therefore critical thinking is absolutely necessary.
Cultural and cross-cultural psychology both study how culture influence human behavior, however cultural psychology concentration is on how culture influences individual behavior in relation to their environment, and cross-cultural psychology examines the effects that culture has on behavior using a critical and comparative approach with at least two cultures.  Both cultural and cross-cultural psychology contribute very important information in regards to how culture influence human behavior but the two have a different approach in regards to understanding and giving an explanation to the relationship between culture and its effects on the human mind and behavior.
The ability to think is one of the most important human characteristics.  Critical thinking is “an active and systematic cognitive strategy to examine, evaluate, and understand events, solve problems, and make decisions on the basis of sound reasoning and valid evidence” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.91). Individuals that possess the ability to think critically are able to see things with an open mind and analyze information from different aspects.  Critical thinking allows individuals to set aside their personal views and have a better understanding of others.  Critical thinking plays a very important role in cross-cultural psychology because one has to be able to recognize the difference between facts and theories setting aside their own personal views and opinions in order to draw an unbiased conclusion from their research.  Critical thinking in cross-cultural psychology is dependent upon the ability to understand different cultures in a way that eliminates the self-fulfilling prophecy, which “is a belief that comes true because we are acting as if it is already true”.
Cross-cultural psychology has four basic goals, which are “description, interpretation, prediction, and management” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.50).  The research process in cross-cultural psychology is divided into two categories, quantitative and qualitative.  The quantitative approach “involves the measurement of certain aspects of human activity from a comparative perspective” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.50) to analyze human behavior.  Central tendency is the most common measurement used in the quantitative approach, such as mean, median, mode, standard deviance, and variance. The qualitative approach is used in “the natural setting, where the research participants carry out their daily activities in a non-research atmosphere.  Qualitative studies are also conducted when there are difficulties in measuring variables, in situations when the subjects cannot read or use answer scales or when there are no standardized measurement instrument available” (Shiraev & Levy, 2010 p.50).  Prior to conducting research a goal must first be established to determine which method would be appropriate for accomplishing that goal because each method of research is designed for certain situations.
 References