Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Cognitive Dissonance & Police Corruption

Leon Festinger developed cognitive dissonance theory that stated “if an uncomfortable feeling or stress is caused by simultaneously holding two contradictory ideas (cognitions), then people will strive to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) by modifying an existing belief or by rejecting one of the two conflicting ideas” (Grigg, 2008).  Cognitive dissonance almost always will have a strong influence on an individual’s behavior and actions because it is a conflict between behavior and belief.   The theory of cognitive dissonance explains how an individual may try to lessen the amount of discomfort by making a decision that will not generate a lot of worry.    Cognitive dissonance plays a part in many important judgments and choices an individual has to make in situations where their morals and beliefs do not agree with the behavior as in the case where the veteran officer extorted money from suspected drug dealers.
According to the Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement “the police organization is the primary public agency representing the state in the lives of citizens” (Punch, 2005).  Police officers have a wide-range of responsibilities that are related to keeping the peace in the community, protecting the citizens and their property and investigating crimes that may occur.  Police officers have been known to partake in questionable behavior while on the force such as, excessive violence on suspects, extortion and drug trafficking just to name a few, which are considered to be corruption.
Police corruption is defined as a “distinct mode of police transgression, which involves the misuse of police power for officer’s benefit or managerial advantage” (Punch, 2005).  An example of police corruption is a veteran police officer extorting money from suspected drug dealer while executing a search warrant.  The police officer would give money to a source and instruct them to buy drugs from suspected drug dealers and told them to leave a small amount of the drugs inside the car of the suspected dealer so when they performed a traffic stop the drugs would be present during the search.  While performing the search on the vehicle and the suspected drug dealer the officer arrest the suspected drug dealer for possession of narcotics and take some or all of the money that was recovered in the search.  Evidence collected during the search was never accounted for because the officer falsified evidence log sheets by excluding the money that was taken for his own personal gain.  The officer then compensated the individual that helped by leaving the drugs in the car with some of the cash that was recovered with stipulations to assist with finding more suspected drug dealers.

Onwudiwe, I., & Onwudiwe, C. (2009). Police corruption. Encyclopedia of race and crime. doi:10.4135/9781412971928.n255


No comments:

Post a Comment